John McEnroe - Unfettered Artistry
As I watched Federer play
Djokovic yesterday – A Game lasting nearly four and a half hours, my mind began
to languorously reminisce about the glorious rivalry that existed between Borg
and McEnroe in the seventy and early eighties. My brother and I used to watch
recordings of those epic finals in the cosmopolitan club of Coimbatore. Those were
days when Television and live broadcasts were a rarity, and all that we had
with us to admire were newspaper clippings, and, of course, the articles and center-spreads in Sportstar. There have been many champions who have graced the open era -
athletes with great athleticism, tremendous reach, marvelous serves and
incredible power; but in my opinion, none matched the dexterity, grace and
sheer magic that emanated from the racket of John McEnroe. Yes, he was
inconsistent, a spoilt child, a man who could throw tantrums at the flip of a
coin, but yet, despite all these inconsistencies, he played the game of tennis
at such a sublime level, that very, very few (possibly Federer comes close)
have ever touched his scales of mastery of the two thousand odd square feet of
a tennis court.
A couple of weeks back, I was
watching clips of that unforgettable 1980 Wimbledon final, which Borg went on
to win and become the only player then to hold aloft the coveted cup fifth time
in a row. But, winning apart, I was palpably lost in the sheer artistry of
McEnroe. His movement around the court, the natural flair of a left hander’s
ground strokes, his audacious and deft angles that seemed to explore every
minute crevice on the other side, the nimble touch that almost would caress the
ball with gentle ease at very last moment to drop perilously over the net ,or
kiss the sidelines; those marvelous wrists which could turn a 180 degrees to
achieve an almost impossible volley - all of these achieved with an aesthetic
symmetry of an artist consumed by an energy and passion of a different
dimension.
Over the years, I have adored
different champions - the Becker’s, the Sampras’s, the Agassi’s, the Nadal’s -
but in my mind, McEnroe stands alone and apart. The other important aspect of
his career is the commitment and zeal with which he played the Davis cup, the
national Tennis event. When most other players sought the ATP circuit and
relegated representing the country to a low priority, McEnroe, almost single-handed, revived the American team with some glorious wins in the Davis cup. He
never allowed his open tours to conflict with his patriotism. Nirmal sekar, the
celebrated sports commentator writes in his inimitable style:
‘ ..A side of the McEnroe
personality - a pointer to his character as a champion - that was generally
ignored when the genius from New York was at his prime had to do with his unshakable commitment to playing for the country. In fact, it was McEnroe's
fierce passion on the Cup stage, his charismatic presence that revived the
sinking fortunes of the oldest team competition in sport at a time when other
superstars such as Jimmy Connors and Bjorn Borg displayed a rather ambivalent
attitude to playing Davis Cup. McEnroe ended his Cup career with a 59-10
record. No man has won more Cup matches while losing fewer!’
Not many players in the open
era will hold up to such a scrutiny.
God bless..
Comments